Election 2024: Free SHS or Economic Relief?

As Ghana approaches the December 7 general elections, a crucial question arises: will voters decide based on the widely popular Free Senior High School (Free SHS) policy, or will they focus on the pressing economic challenges facing the nation?

This decision reflects a pivotal moment in Ghana’s political journey. Voters must choose between supporting a transformative educational policy and holding the government accountable for economic difficulties that affect their daily lives.

To understand the mindset of Ghanaian voters, we might look to recent events in the U.S. election, where a similar pattern emerged. Despite significant national debate around social issues like abortion, many American voters supported a candidate focused on economic recovery, particularly in states where the economy was a top concern.

Donald Trump’s appeal, centred on economic promises rather than social issues, highlights a global trend where voters increasingly prioritise economic stability over other policies.

Since the New Patriotic Party (NPP) introduced the Free SHS policy in 2017, Ghana’s educational landscape has been transformed, even amid various challenges. The policy provides free secondary education to students who might otherwise struggle to afford it, bringing educational equity within reach. For many families, Free SHS has created new opportunities, especially in rural communities where access to education has historically been limited. To these families, the policy signifies progress, inclusion, and social change.

Politically, the Free SHS policy carries strong emotional appeal, especially for families who have directly benefited. Many parents see it as a symbol of hope and a bridge to a better future for their children. For them, education, and the opportunities it brings, may take precedence over economic concerns.

However, this optimism stands in stark contrast to Ghana’s current economic reality. Inflation is high, the cost of living has surged, and unemployment remains a significant challenge. For many Ghanaians struggling to make ends meet, the benefits of Free SHS may feel insufficient compared to the rising costs of food, limited healthcare, and daily survival.

For these voters, the question becomes whether the educational gains of Free SHS are enough to justify supporting the ruling government, especially as economic struggles worsen.

Historically, Ghanaians have voted based on economic promises. The 2008, 2016, and 2020 elections were shaped by pledges of a stable economy, more jobs, and a stronger currency. Yet, many now feel these promises have gone unfulfilled, pushing economic concerns to the forefront. As inflation continues to erode purchasing power, there’s a growing demand for the government to address the everyday needs of the average Ghanaian.

Once again, the recent U.S. election sheds light on this dilemma. Despite controversies, Donald Trump’s message of economic revival struck a chord with voters who prioritized jobs and growth over social issues.

A similar trend may emerge in Ghana. While Free SHS has made a difference for many, economic hardship may ultimately drive voter decisions, especially for those who do not directly benefit from the policy.

The choice between Free SHS and economic stability is ultimately about priorities. Voters whose children benefit from Free SHS may be inclined to support the NPP, viewing the policy as an investment in Ghana’s future. In contrast, those facing economic hardship may lean towards the National Democratic Congress (NDC), which promises immediate economic relief through its proposed 24-hour policy.

There’s also the possibility of middle-ground voters who value both education and economic stability. For them, the decision may hinge on which party appears more committed to addressing both issues holistically.

In Ghana, as in many places around the world, the political landscape is increasingly complex, with voters balancing competing priorities.

The outcome of this election will reveal whether Ghanaians are at a turning point, one where economic concern may outweigh social policy benefits. The 2024 election could set a precedent for how Ghanaian voters prioritise issues, shaping future political campaigns and policy directions.

If voters prioritise economic solutions, it may signal a shift towards immediate, practical relief over long-term social benefits. On the other hand, if Free SHS remains the top priority, it would affirm that for many Ghanaians, education is the ultimate legacy, a vote for future generations over present challenges.

 

BY: Naa Kwaamah Siaw-Marfo