Adsense Skyscrapper

Galamsey Bribbery Exposé …Anas goes pond-for-pound with Bissue

Renowned Investigative Journalist, Anas Aremeyaw-Anas of Tiger Eye PI fame, is insisting his firm has compelling evidence in the form of visuals, audios and audio-visuals to prove beyond reasonable doubt that Mr. Charles Bissue, a former secretary to the Inter-Ministerial Committee on Illegal Mining (IMCIM) was complicit in illegal mining activities and was actually engaged in bribery and corruption.

A statement issued by Tiger Eye and signed by Mr. Aremeyaw-Anas noted that “Tiger Eye affirms and maintains its investigations and conclusions in the Galamsey Fraud documentary about Mr. Charles Bissue and other staff at the dissolved IMCIM. Any claims or allegations to the contrary are false and without merit. Mr. Charles Bissue engaged in bribery and corruption and Tiger Eye uncovered this in the form of audio-visual evidence when undercover journalists posed as owners of an abandoned mining company”

In a rebuttal statement, Mr. Charles Bissue described Anas and the Tiger Eye firm as corrupt journalists involved as a “baseless propaganda to serve their paymasters.”

Charles Bissue who had to resign his position as Secretary to the IMCIM after Anas’ Tiger Eye showed the damning investigative documentary in 2019, maintains in his counter statement that he is still as innocent as he was way back when the investigative piece went public some three years ago.

Below are the two statements uncensored:

GALAMSEY FRAUD EXPOSÉ: REFUTING CLAIMS OF MR CHARLES BISSUE

1. Tiger Eye P. I has taken note of a series of lies and calumnies put out by the embattled secretary to the then Inter-Ministerial Committee on Illegal Mining (IMCIM), Mr Charles Bissue, in his desperate attempt to defend his misconduct as captured in the documentary dubbed ‘Galamsey Fraud Part I’ that was published in February 2019.
The latest of his lies which have animated responses from Tiger Eye are contained in his press release dated 6 October 2022.

2. Tiger Eye’s position, conduct and approach to all investigations are based on truth, facts and audio-visual evidence. Tiger Eye affirms and maintains its investigations and conclusions in the Galamsey Fraud documentary about Mr. Charles Bissue and other staff at the dissolved IMCIM. Any claims or allegations to the contrary are false and without merit. Mr. Charles Bissue engaged in bribery and corruption and Tiger Eye uncovered this in the form of audio-visual evidence when undercover journalists posed as owners of an abandoned mining company.

3. Allegations by Mr. Bissue that agents of Tiger Eye P.I solicited monies from him to drop the investigative piece is merely an afterthought and a figment of his imagination. It is part of the recent mantra by persons aught in undercover investigations to say it was published to disgrace them after they failed to pay monies. The old mantra was “entrapment. None of these persons filmed engaged in bribery and corruption has ever been able to prove such allegations nor won any Court case confirming such fake claims.
It defies logic and exposes the incoherence in Mr Charles Bissue’s narrative that Tiger Eye would demand bribes to drop a story it had advertised long before.

4. Tiger Eye set out to expose heavyweights who dabbled in the illicit galamsey trade on the back of our firm conviction that nobody should be allowed to profit from the devastations of our environment and to augment the President, Nana AkufTo-Addo’s commitment to fighting the menace.

5. When Tiger Eye received a tip-off from persons who had witnessed the first-hand sabotage from officials who were kept in charge of redeeming our environment from pillage by greedy individuals and established prima facie, we set out to investigate the claims through a sting operation, popularly known as the “Anas principle”.
6. In the course of our investigations, investigators busted Charles Bissue who took bribes on two occasions to allow our mining company to undertake illegal mining in defiance of the approved regime for regulating mining activities.

7. Subsequently, Tiger Eye petitioned the Office of the Special Prosecutor with all tapes and recordings as irrefutable proofs of official complicity in the galamsey menace with Charles Bissue as the arrowhead of same. The OSP announced an investigation into the complaint, and since called witnesses, amongst other processes.

8. While investigations were ongoing under the OSP, we noticed a parallel investigation (an unwelcomed intrusion) was opened by the Tiwaah Addo Danquah-led CID on the back of a so-called complaint from the Chairman of the IMCIM, Prof. Frimpong Boateng, which generated enormous public opprobrium.

9. Tiger Eye, sensing a fishy move had been designed to undermine the investigations of the OSP took a decision not to collaborate with the CID since the same would have amounted to duplication of effort and a waste of precious resources, especially so when we suspected the whole CID intrusion was a smokescreen. Therefore, the so-called CID report which Mr. Bissue always hurriedly likes to bask in had no inputs from Tiger Eye who were the sole authors of the Galamsey Fraud investigations, and so, Tiger Eye considers the said report as a white-washing antic with no credibility.

10. Mr. Charles Bissue claims persons within NPP recorded the videos which expose his bribe-taking moves and sold them to Tiger Eye, and that, those monies were donated by the Ashanti Regional Chairman of the NPP popularly known as Wontumi for a party activity. That’s completely false. For the records, no agent of Tiger Eye works with or for the NPP, and, Tiger Eye has a time-tested procedure for employing its agents, who are usually highly trained and skilled in investigating the underworld. The conversations that ensued before Mr. Bissue took the bribes in our investigative piece are a matter of public record. Those conversations had nothing to do with any party activity which Mr Bissue is struggling very hard, albeit unsuccessfully, to interpolate into the whole narrative. Tiger Eye agents do not deliver party donations!

11. Tiger Eye is not privy to any clearance of Mr. Bissue by either the former Special Prosecutor or the current Special Prosecutor. It is interesting how Mr. Bissue, a suspect of OSP is bravingly claiming OSP has cleared him without the knowledge of the Complainant in the case i.e., Tiger Eye. Since the OSP is still seized with the matter, Tiger Eye is restraining itself from jeopardising the investigations and wouldn’t want to put out too many details. We still patiently await pronouncements from the OSP, especially in the wake of the renewed galamsey struggle

12. Our agent, from whom Mr Charles Bissue took the bribes to facilitate the illegal mining activities, is available and will always avail himself to bear testimony at any forum properly constituted for that purpose. The names being bandied about by Mr. Charles Bissue are a figment of his imagination.

13. We urge the public to disregard the wobbly attempts by Mr. Charles Bissue and his collaborators to fend off the damning revelations contained in the Galamsey Fraud expose, as those attempts are nothing but the kicks of a dying horse
{SGD}
Anas Aremeyaw Anas
Chief Executive officer
Tiger Eye P.I

Re: Galamsey Fraud Expose: Refuting Claims Of Charles Bissue

While I will not usually respond to propaganda, it will be a disservice to the discerning Ghanaian if I allow Tiger Eye P.I to get away with his baseless press release. First, I issued a statement underpinned by facts, against the claims made by the opposition National Democratic Congress (NDC) about the government’s effort in the galamsey fight. Albeit not referenced to Tiger Eye P.I, and typical of the nature of his corrupted journalism, they fatuously jumped in with their usual baseless propaganda to serve their paymasters. Although this advice will fall on deafened ears because that is the path they’ve chosen to travel, they should do better.

Now respectfully, let me lay down the facts and I believe Tiger Eye P.I can learn from it.

1. Vetting of licenses begun on 3 September 2018. The Ministry of Information on 30 August 2018 published the commencement date and requirements for the vetting process. Documents required were to be submitted via post or in-person to the Inter-Ministerial Committee on Illegal Mining (IMCIM) before 7 September 2018.

2. ORR Resources through its “ghostly representative” presented its documents at a later date. ORR Resources’ license at the time of submission was expiring in two months. Upon receiving the documents, it was tendered for evaluation. I then recommended the company files an application for all other permits required, which includes Environmental Permit.

3. As part of the approval processes, each concession was required to be mapped. This exercise was done per a schedule. The concession in question (as indicated in ORR Resources’ application) was in the Ashanti Region. The mapping team were then in the Central Region enroute to Western, Ashanti and Eastern Region.

4. All applicants were required to pay an amount of GHC3,000.00, to which I directed the “ghostly representative” to pay and take a receipt issued to cover such payment. The risk of delay in getting their application approved before the mapping team leaves the Ashanti Region was high.
5. The exercise did not provide for a mop up, and as such it was prudent and fair to grant the company an opportunity to have the concession mapped while the application is processed. Waiting for the mapping team to complete the entire national exercise just to return later and map out ORR Resource’s concession was not only unwise but at a rather unjustifiable cost to the state.

6. It was in this context, I suggested the application be fast-tracked such that the data from the mapping exercise could be merged with every entry on our system. I did not circumvent any process, and there is evidence to that.

7. I did not demand any money from the applicant with promise of fast tracking or facilitating the process. The money in question was a donation from Bernard Antwi Boasiako [alias Chairman Wontumi] for a party activity. I did not grant the company any rights to resume mining when at the time, the ban was in force as published by Tiger Eye P.I.

8. For the record, I don’t consider your work as an entrapment. In fact, it is hollow and a failed attempt to smear my reputation with lies, just as you’ve done to your victims in the past. I dare say, and I repeat that you are a liar, and should Ghanaians entertain your deceitful antics, this fight will never yield any results.

9. Your claims of me demanding money or bribes is inconsistent with the very footages in the video and publications made in the New Crusading Guide in 2019. Reference the image below.

10. I repeat, that Francis Owusu Akyaw, [a former staff of IMCIM whom I fired for misconduct] orchestrated these secret recordings. The documentary Tiger Eye published had Francis Owusu Akyaw’s name [referred as Owusu in the tape] mentioned as the one behind it.

11. The ban on small scale mining was lifted on 17 December 2018. Before the trailer of the documentary was published [in 2019], I received an anonymous call with a demands for a ransom to be paid so the airing of the video could be stopped. Knowing and convinced by my actions of having done no wrong told the person to go public with whatever they have on me.

12. I stepped out of office as Secretary of the IMCIM just after the documentary was aired to allow a proper and uncompromised investigation to be undertaken. This has act goes to prove I had nothing to hide.
13. In July 2019, the Police after a thorough investigation into the allegations, exonerated me. Report on their investigation is a public knowledge.

14. It is rather ironic that Tiger Eye P.I who in its years of so-called undercover investigations, recognized and subjected its findings to the Police, now finds the institution as lacking the credibility to handle similar cases today.

15. In any event, following a petition to the OSP in 2019, I have availed myself for interrogations, and been very cooperative in unravelling this truth in this case. Mr Martin Amidu [then Special Prosecutor] hinted in his corruption risk assessment of the Agyapa Deal, of the extent to which he had carried his investigation by indicating there was a “matter of identity” yet to be uncovered. I believe Mr. Martin Amidu provided his report on the subject matter in his handing over notes to the new Special Prosecutor.

16. Tiger Eye P.I cannot capitalize on this moment to dissuade Ghanaians from interrogating this matter. Where lies his credibility in the fight against galamsey when he had turned a blind eye to the unprecedented devastation caused by galamseyers to our lands and water bodies? His silence is nothing short of a traitor and a nation wrecker whose interest was to conjure propaganda to take me out for fighting the miscreants in our mining sector.

17. I dare Anas Aremeyaw Anas, and his entire Tiger Eye P.I to publish the Part 2 of that documentary. Why has he shelved that part? Or he’s been paid off to conceal that? Mr Aremeyaw Anas is a wimp, and cannot be trusted.

18. Until I mentioned the name of the IMCIM Chairman, Prof Kwabena Frimpong-Boateng in my recent release, Anas Aremeyaw Anas had remained mute over the defense I put against his claims. Why so? I’m sure he’s alarmed and fears for what will ensue later on.

19. It is no doubt that Anas Aremeyaw Anas has been cowed into silence by his own nemesis, and the persistence at which I expose the untruth about his work. Ghanaians are very discerning and have come to realize the spin he puts on his recordings to defame people. They will put to strict scrutiny every piece of publication he does going forward.

Vindication is in the womb of time!

****SIGNED****

Comments are closed.