Opuni Trial: Give Agongo 4 documents by Dec. 11 – Court orders CRIG, CHED
An Accra High Court on Monday, 3 November 2018 ordered the Executive Directors of the Cocoa Research Institute of Ghana (CRIG) and Cocoa Health and Extension Division (CHED), to furnish the lawyer for businessman Seidu Agongo with some four essential documents by 11 December 2018 in the ongoing GHS217 million Opuni-Agongo trial.
“Upon hearing the lead counsel for the 2nd and 3rd accused persons for the furnishing of letters dated 20th of November 2014 on the renewal of CRIG certificate for pesticides, fertilisers and spraying machines for January to December 2015 with reference number CRIG4VOL54/7014, another letter with reference number CRG.39/14VOL.19/6448 dated 21 October 2014 and their attachments and also handing over notes of Dr Anim Kwapong together with its attachments and the report on the testing of agrochemicals and spraying machines for use on cocoa farms in Ghana also by Dr Anim Kwapong by which he signed every page. Further, a signed and completed report on the field visits to the regions by the management of the Cocoa Health and Extension Division of COCOBOD on April 15, 2015. The DPP doesn’t oppose the application. Consequently, it is hereby ordered that the Executive Director of CRIG and CHED do produce and file before this court the said documents by Tuesday, 11 December 2018”, Justice C.Y. Hornyenuga ordered.
At the hearing, Mr Benson Nutsukpui, the lead counsel for Mr Agongo also demonstrated to the court that the chemical composition and scientific operation of Lithovit Foliar fertiliser, which is at the heart of the case, aided not only cocoa yield but worked perfectly on vegetables and other plants, too.
During his cross-examination of the state’s second prosecution witness, Dr Alfred Arthur, Mr Nutsukpui stated that available literature on Lithovit Foliar fertiliser indicates that it speeds up photosynthesis and releases a high concentration of Carbon Dioxide, which essentially stimulates growth in plants.
Dr Arthur agreed to that particular assertion and affirmed to the court that, indeed, that particular physicochemical reaction is what Lithovit Foliar fertiliser is well-known for.
He also affirmed that an activity called tribodynamic action, in which the particles of Lithovit Foliar fertiliser permeate into the stomata of the leaves, ignites the release of plant energy essential for growth.
As such, this quality of Lithovit Foliar fertiliser makes it essential not only for cocoa tree growth but also for the growth of other plant species including vegetables.
Dr Arthur again responded in the affirmative when Mr Nutsukpui told the court that when Lithovit Foliar fertiliser is sprayed on leaves, it leaves a thin layer on the surface of the leaves which ensures the release of more plant energy to aid growth.
Here are excerpts of today’s proceedings:
Cross-examination by Nutsukpui
Q. You gave some evidence that you did some reading on Lithovit.
A. Yes my lord.
Q. Did it also come to your attention while you were reading on Lithovit that it is not soluble in water?
A. No my lord. In all cases, Lithovit was recommended to be mixed with water at the point of application and in fact, the scientific advisor to Zeovita GMBH, Prof Dr Bilal in 2010 recommended Lithovit to be applied at the rate of 500g in 100 litres of water.
Q. So, is it your position that Lithovit is soluble in water?
A. Yes.
Q. I am putting it to you that all scientific evidence indicates that Lithovit is not soluble in water.
A. As I indicated to the court earlier, work done on Lithovit here in Ghana by Prof Nkansah and Prof Owusu, both at the University of Ghana, clearly stated that Lithovit foliar fertiliser was mixed with water at the point of application. The client of that work was Agricult Ghana Limited and the report is dated December 2013
Q. And you have the report?
A. My lord, I have to look for it.
Q. You can bring it at the next sitting?
A. I can’t promise but I will look for it.
Q. When we say something is soluble in water, it means it dissolves in water.
A. Yes my lord.
Q. Like sugar dissolves in water?
A. Yes my lord.
Q. And is it your position that Profs Nkansah and Owusu stated that Lithovit is soluble in water?
A. The treatment they tested indicated that Lithovit was mixed with water at the point of application. Per the treatment they tested.
Q. Are you deducing from the treatment or Profs Nkansah and Owusu stated that Lithovit is soluble in water?
A. My lord, I am deducing from the treatment and also from the scientific advisor to Zeovita GMBH, manufacturers of the Lithovit foliar fertiliser.
Q. I am suggesting to you that Zeovita did not state that Lithovit is soluble in water. It specifically stated that it is not soluble in water.
A. What I am quoting is from the scientific advisor to Zeovita and not Zeovita as a company.
Q. It is true that when Lithovit is sprayed on the leaves, it leaves particles size smaller than stomata openings on the leaves.
A. Yes.
Q. It is also true that its particles penetrate through to the stomata to the intercellular compartment?
A. Yes.
Q. It is also true that that action creates a physicochemical reaction at the cell membrane releasing Carbon Dioxide at high concentration?
A. That is correct and, in fact, that is the main function of the powdery Lithovit Foliar fertiliser and not by inducing flowering.
Q. As a result of the physicochemical reaction, photosynthesis is greatly enhanced.
A. Yes.
Q. Do you know what is called tribodynamic action?
A. Yes.
Q. That is the effective action that Lithovit ignites in the plant.
A. Yes.
Q. And that increases the energy converted from the particles.
A. That’s correct.
Q. It is true that when Lithovit is sprayed as a suspension on the leaves, a considerable portion of it remains in a thin layer on the leaf’s surface.
A. That’s correct.
Q. Indeed, it is also true that there are 2 mechanisms by which Carbon Dioxide is released from Lithovit.
A. I don’t know that one.
Q. You will agree with me that if the particles were soluble in water, the solution cannot form a thin layer.
A. Not entirely so.
Former Ghana Cocoa Board (COCOOD) CEO Dr Stephen Opuni as well as Mr Agongo, and Agricult are facing 27 charges of willfully causing financial loss of GHS217 million to the state, through three separate fertiliser supply contracts between 2014 and 2016.
The contracts were GHS43.1million (2013/2014 cocoa farming season), GHS75.3million (2014/2015 cocoa farming season) and GHS98.9million (2015/2016 cocoa farming season) totalling GHS217million through sole-sourcing, the state claimed, adding that procurement procedures for sole-sourcing were not followed.
According to the charges, the consignments of Lithovit Foliar were produced locally, contrary to an agreement between COCOBOD and Agricult Ghana Company Limited that it be sourced from Germany.
Also, the Attorney General claims the fertilisers were manufactured without registration, thereby, flouting the Plants and Fertiliser Act 2010.
Justice Honyenugah, a Court of Appeal Judge is sitting on the case as an additional High Court Judge.
Source: classfmonline
Comments are closed.